Open book, speech bubble and a database

Choosing a Database for Enterprise RAG: PostgreSQL, Azure SQL or a Vector Database

pgvector on PostgreSQL, Azure SQL or a separate vector database for your RAG project? A decision tree based on scale, access control, data protection and operating cost.

November 14, 2026

When you choose a database for an enterprise RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) system, the real question isn’t “which vector database?” but “where does the enterprise data live, and who can access what?” For most organizations, the best start is to add vector search to the PostgreSQL (pgvector), SQL Server or Azure SQL database where the data already lives. A separate vector database or search engine should come into play only with very large scale, many data sources or advanced search needs.

This guide is for IT managers and architects planning to connect enterprise documents and databases to AI assistants. We compare the technology options by scale, security, data protection and operating cost.

Data & AI

The right data architecture for your RAG project

Aryasoft designs database choice, access control and personal data protection together when connecting your enterprise data to AI applications.

Book a Meeting

The Options at a Glance

Option Best fit Watch out for
PostgreSQL + pgvector The data is in PostgreSQL or an open source stack is preferred; medium to large scale Vector index tuning and memory planning
SQL Server 2025 / Azure SQL The data is in SQL Server; the team works with T-SQL and the Microsoft ecosystem Vector indexes are in preview in SQL Server 2025
Search engine (with vector support) Many document sources, advanced full-text and hybrid search needs A separate system; permissions must be kept in sync
Dedicated vector database Hundreds of millions of vectors, very high query load, advanced vector-specific features Extra operational burden; data and permissions in two places

The Layers of a RAG System

The database is only one layer of a RAG architecture. To make the right decision, you need to see the whole flow:

Layer Job Relationship to the database
Data collection Gathering documents, database records and other sources Reading from source systems; tracking changes
Chunking Splitting content into meaningful pieces Storing chunks and metadata
Embedding Turning each chunk into a vector Storing vectors
Access control Deciding which chunks a user may see Row-level security, permission metadata
Retrieval Finding the chunks most relevant to the question Vector, full-text or hybrid search
Answer generation Giving the retrieved chunks to a language model as context Controlling the data that leaves
Logging and monitoring Recording the question, the sources used and the answer Audit logs

Decision Criteria

1. Where does the data live?

If most of the data is already in a relational database (ERP, CRM, product catalog, support tickets), keeping the vectors in the same database largely removes synchronization, consistency and permission problems. If the sources are very varied (file servers, email, wiki pages, several databases), a central search layer may fit better.

2. Scale

Scale Recommendation
A few thousand to a few hundred thousand chunks Your existing relational database; often exact search without even an index
Millions of chunks A vector index in the relational database (pgvector HNSW, Azure SQL DiskANN)
Hundreds of millions of chunks and high query load Consider a dedicated vector database or a scalable search engine

3. Access control

This is the most critical and most often neglected requirement of enterprise RAG. Users must see only chunks of content they’re authorized for. In relational databases, Row-Level Security can apply this filter directly to the search query. If you use a separate vector system, the permissions in the source systems must be carried over to it accurately and kept current.

Critical

A RAG system without access control turns into a search box where anyone can query all of the organization’s documents. Chunks of HR, legal or finance documents can appear in an answer to a user who isn’t authorized to see them. Enforce permissions at the retrieval stage, not after the answer is generated.

4. Data protection and data location

Question Why it matters
Does the content to be vectorized include personal data? Personal data you don’t need, especially special categories, should be removed or masked before processing.
Where do the embedding and language model services run? Context sent to a service abroad may count as a cross-border transfer under data protection law.
Are questions and answers logged, and where? User questions can contain personal data too.
Are you in a regulated sector? In sectors such as banking, the requirement to keep systems in-country directly shapes the architecture.

In organizations with strict data location requirements, running the language model and embedding model in-house and keeping every RAG layer in their own data center is an increasingly common option. In that case PostgreSQL or SQL Server 2025 running in-house is a natural database choice.

5. Operating cost

Every new system means setup, backups, monitoring, security patches, permission management and expertise. Using your existing database platform lets the operating processes your team already knows apply to RAG too.

Example: Vector Search with pgvector

In PostgreSQL, the pgvector extension stores vectors in the same table as business data and runs fast approximate search with an HNSW index. The example below uses three-dimensional vectors to show the idea:

CREATE EXTENSION IF NOT EXISTS vector;

CREATE TABLE doc_chunks (
    id         bigint GENERATED ALWAYS AS IDENTITY PRIMARY KEY,
    department text NOT NULL,
    content    text NOT NULL,
    embedding  vector(3) NOT NULL
);

INSERT INTO doc_chunks (department, content, embedding) VALUES
  ('it',      'Backup policy',          '[0.9, 0.1, 0.0]'),
  ('it',      'Restore procedure',      '[0.8, 0.2, 0.1]'),
  ('finance', 'Budget approval process', '[0.0, 0.2, 0.9]');

CREATE INDEX ON doc_chunks USING hnsw (embedding vector_cosine_ops);

-- Nearest chunks by cosine distance, only within the user's department
SELECT content, embedding <=> '[0.85, 0.15, 0.05]' AS distance
FROM doc_chunks
WHERE department = 'it'
ORDER BY embedding <=> '[0.85, 0.15, 0.05]'
LIMIT 2;

The department filter in the example stands for a simple access control. In real systems, enforce this filter at database level with a Row-Level Security policy. We show the SQL Server and Azure SQL equivalent in our vector search in Azure SQL post.

Tip

Don’t start a RAG project by picking technology; start with a test set built from real user questions. Fifty to a hundred real questions with their expected source documents make it measurable which chunking method, which search type and which database meet your needs.

Decision Tree

  1. Do you have a data location requirement? If so, limit yourself to options where every layer (the model included) can run in a suitable location.
  2. Is the data mostly in one relational database? If so, start with that database’s vector support.
  3. Does the chunk count exceed millions? If so, use a vector index and measure performance.
  4. Do you need many different sources and advanced full-text search? If so, consider a search layer with vector support.
  5. Do measurements show the relational database isn’t enough? Only then move to a dedicated vector database.

Enterprise RAG with Aryasoft

With our experience in SQL Server, Azure SQL and PostgreSQL, Aryasoft designs the data layer of your RAG projects: which platform the data stays on, how vector search runs, how access control carries into search and how personal data is protected. The biggest risk we see in the field is RAG applications fed with unmasked data producing answers that cross permission boundaries, so we make security part of the architecture from day one. For details, see our data analytics and AI services, and our data governance post for the governance side.

Frequently Asked Questions

No. PostgreSQL (pgvector) and SQL Server 2025 or Azure SQL can store vectors and run similarity search. In most enterprise scenarios, starting with the database where the data already lives is the lowest-risk choice.
With HNSW and IVFFlat indexes it can run fast approximate search over millions of vectors. At much larger scale, assess it by measuring memory, index build time and query load.
Each chunk is stored with the permission information of its source document, and the search query is filtered by the user’s permissions. In relational databases, Row-Level Security can make this filter mandatory at database level.
Yes. The language model, embedding model and database can all run in-house. This approach stands out in organizations with strict data location requirements; hardware and operating costs need separate planning.

Sources

The technical details in this guide were checked against the following sources in November 2026.

  1. pgvector
  2. PostgreSQL documentation: Row Security Policies
  3. Microsoft Learn: Vector Search and Vector Index
  4. Microsoft Learn: Row-level security
  5. Microsoft Learn: Retrieval Augmented Generation overview

Data & AI

Connect AI to your data safely

Aryasoft designs the data layer, access control and personal data protection for your RAG projects on your existing platform.

4.7/5